pedophiles in the act and a misdemeanor?
's amendment, which also saw the signing of Gasparri allows the harasser does not end up in jail.
that the law on wiretapping and blocking information on the gag has been a wonderful opportunity to enter into unholy pacts with the church hierarchy had all understood. Because it is a fact that one of the many nefarious rules provides that, if you have to intercept a clergyman, first you need to warn its hierarchy. Which, I suppose, the authors found in this beautiful, is justified by the certainty that those who are dedicated to the care of souls first cares about her and never, ever be revealed to the brother who is an unbeliever and the Communist pm to go to control the phone. He thought he had hit rock bottom: 8 per thousand, subsidies to Catholic schools, ICI exemption, I do not know what else, and now also the privileges of the priests under investigation. Contempt for the Constitution of these people really do not have limits. Now there is another, the initiative is (ricordatevene well please, these names must not be forgotten) of
Gasparri, Bricolo, Quagliariello, Centaro, Berson, Mazzatorta Divine . What have they done? The thing is complicated.
There is an article of the Criminal Procedure Code (380) that lists the cases where you must (you can not, it should be) the arrest in flagrante delicto, which means that the offender is caught while committing a crime is packed away and taken to prison, then the process but, for now, remains in jail. Among the offenses for which you "must" stop was not the crime of sexual acts with minors (609 bc criminal code). So, with a rare legislative acumen, some of our Solons has seen fit to put it, taking advantage of the Law & block gag. Bravo, well, Ia. At this point the police (ie, PS, DC, financial police, traffic wardens etc., Are the ones who make the arrests in flagrante delicto), where he was pecking at a sexual activity with a minor, was ("was" not "could" ) arrest. Is there anyone who doubts that it was good and right thing? Well, somebody was, because these Gasparri & Companions have submitted an amendment (1707) absolutely cryptic (to put it all together it took me half an hour), which amends the article 380 of the Code of Procedure, newly edited by someone of their own parish in the sense that yes, okay, those who commit sexual acts with minors and is caught in flagrante delicto must be arrested, but that it is not always sexual act of "minor" (really the legislative technique (?) adopted is more complicated but there the economy, the result is this). So, now police, CC, GDF, traffic wardens, when they catch a pedophile with his pants down (or lift their skirts) must decide, before you end, if what he is doing is normal or less than normal gravity, and, in the latter case, they can not even stop it.
Do you realize? The Supreme Court will decide whether damages for what has been done to the boy or girl is of minor or not. Why it is important: if the fact is minor, the penalty is reduced to two thirds, that's not just stuff, you go from 5 years to just over 2 years, which means probation with the social service, so no jail, and indeed, with a couple of mitigating circumstances (extenuating circumstances and damages) will be approximately one year, which means suspended sentence. So you can imagine such monuments are built of legal culture in Court Appeal and Cassation. E & Gasparri companion to the appropriate officer the responsibility to decide if the pedophile / to be arrested or not. There, on two feet while you are raising or lowering his pants a skirt. The thing is so bad that now the majority said of wanting to re-think. Is it true? Question: But what did matter to them pedophiles? Serious or not that is the act (imagine the disgusting charts), really not good to send them to jail for a while '? Committing a crime have been caught, there is little to discuss. So what? Some thought the rules reverent "Vatican" is really out of place?
Done by The Daily of June 2, 2010