Miralax Gatorade Prep

Dear Director Stefano Giovannini

Thirty
My name is Mark and I had the pleasure of speaking with her by phone about the problem of recycling.

I thought back to the question of Montespertoli She told me where citizens to pay less tax on garbage, though separate, releasing the waste into nearby towns.

my opinion after a review, the issue has been addressed otherwise. Here I'll explain below.

try first to understand what are the priorities of the average citizen in order of importance today:

1) pay the least possible clarity.
2) Living in a clean environment as much as possible
3) Do not unnecessarily ingrullire no economic benefits to the collection.
4) The environmental values \u200b\u200bwith the recovery of paper, glass etc.. (Recycling)

a need for a family I do not mean others are. As you can see the environment by recycling is the last place.

How do we then convince the average citizen to do the collection, to convince him that it is also convenient to him?
The average citizen is, for example, as a 'twin-engine plane. With one engine not working well, and the risk of falling. The only engine that the city currently is the environmental values \u200b\u200b(including the future of their children).
Try turning the second engine with tangible incentives.

These incentives should be given by the BONUS, in which citizens have the right as they reach certain quotas of collection. How much garbage

Italian produces the average citizen? I do not know. But this research base by region, municipality by municipality can establish the basic parameters, which then generate the so-called bonus rebate to which a citizen has the right of the garbage in your taxes for next year.

must also establish the relationships between the various collections: 100 Kg of paper what they're worth? 1 €, 2 €?
100 kg of plastic?
100 kg of iron?
100 kg of glass?
etc..

produce the base tables that relate to each the weight of the collection with the value financial benefit that you can.

All this is easily applicable to the technology that I saw today, almost exclusively in northern Italy.
Each poses its own collection, and is awarded each year a differentiated production of garbage.

I think there will be the opposite of today, there will be races in sourcing of other junk.
would be really funny to see people fighting, the trash.

I've thought and thought and are not able to find negative points in this speech or project you want to call.

I leave my idea to his careful examination to see if there are negative points, and are possibly available to him to talk about directly if he believes, the better to negotiate, extend and test it. All the while it is theoretically understood

really hoping to find a solution for waste with recycling, so not needing to resort to the construction of an incinerator, in terms of costs, both for the health, both for the environment. The incinerators are now affordable only for those who build them, and they are very damaging to the health of those living nearby. Perhaps future technology will improve emissions and energy production, but for now it does not.

Sincerely

Marco Thirty